Mothers aren't the only ones who are biologically adapted to respond to children. New research from the University of Notre Dame shows that dads who sleep near their children experience a drop in testosterone. Previous research from humans and other species suggests this decrease might make men more responsive to their children's needs and help them focus on the demands of parenthood.
In a recent study, Notre Dame Anthropologist Lee Gettler shows that
close sleep proximity between fathers and their children (on the same
sleeping surface) results in lower testosterone compared to fathers who
sleep alone.
The study will appear in the September 5 issue of the journal PLoS ONE.
Gettler sampled 362 fathers, all of whom were between 25-26 years
old, and divided them according to their reported nighttime sleeping
location: solitary sleepers, those who slept in the same room as their
children, and those fathers who slept on the same surface as their
children.
Fathers' testosterone levels were measured from saliva samples
collected upon waking and again just prior to sleep. Though the waking
hormone levels of the three groups showed no significant differences,
fathers who slept on the same surface as their children showed the
lowest evening testosterone.
"Human fathers' physiology has the capacity to respond to children,"
Gettler says. "Our prior research has shown that when men become
fathers, their testosterone decreases, sometimes dramatically, and that
those who spend the most time in hands-on care -- playing with their
children, feeding them or reading to them -- had lower testosterone.
These new results complement the original research by taking it one step
further, showing that nighttime closeness or proximity between fathers
and their kids has effects on men's biology, and it appears to be
independent of what they are doing during the day."
Substantial research has been conducted on the sleep and
breastfeeding physiology of mother-baby co-sleeping, but this is the
first study to examine how father-child sleep proximity may affect men's
physiology, and it is the first to explore the implications of
co-sleeping for either mothers' or fathers' hormones.
In other species, testosterone is known to enhance male mating effort
through its influence on muscle mass and behaviors related to competing
with other males and attracting female attention. The hormone is
thought to operate similarly in humans, and higher testosterone has been
linked to behaviors that might conflict with effective fathering, such
as risk taking and sensation seeking. Prior research found that men with
lower testosterone reported greater sympathy or need to respond to
infant cries relative to men with higher testosterone.
"There are so many intriguing possibilities here for future research:
Why do fathers have lower testosterone when they sleep very close to
their children? Does it reflect human fathers' roles in our evolutionary
past? How much do fathers vary in their nighttime care when their kids
are close by? How does co-sleeping change fathers' sleep architecture
when we know that co-sleeping increases mothers' arousals and mothers
sync to their infants' sleep patterns," says Gettler.
"Testosterone is a hormone that frequently is a part of public
discourse, but the false idea that 'manliness' is exclusively driven by
testosterone often dominates the conversation. There is growing evidence
that men's physiology can respond to involved parenthood -- something
that was long thought to be limited to women. This suggests to us that
active fatherhood has a deep history in the human species and our
ancestors. For some people, the social idea that taking care of your
kids is a key component of masculinity and manliness may not be new, but
we see increasing biological evidence suggesting that males have long
embraced this role."
Journal Reference:
- Lee T. Gettler, James J. McKenna, Thomas W. McDade, Sonny S. Agustin, Christopher W. Kuzawa. Does Cosleeping Contribute to Lower Testosterone Levels in Fathers? Evidence from the Philippines. PLoS ONE, 2012; 7 (9): e41559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041559
Courtesy: ScienceDaily
No comments:
Post a Comment