Just as banks store away only the most valuable possessions in the most
secure safes, cells prioritise which genes they guard most closely,
researchers at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory's European
Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) have found. The study, just
published online in Nature, shows that bacteria have evolved a
mechanism that protects important genes from random mutation,
effectively reducing the risk of self-destruction. The findings answer a
question that has been under debate for half a century and provide
insights into how disease-causing mutations arise and pathogens evolve.
"We discovered that there must be a molecular mechanism that
preferentially protects certain areas of the genome over others," says
Nicholas Luscombe, who led the research at EMBL-EBI. "If we can identify
the proteins involved and uncover how this works, we will be even
closer to understanding how mutations that lead to diseases like cancer
can be prevented."
Mutations are the reason each of us is unique. These changes to our
genetic material are at the root of variation between individuals, and
between cells within individuals. But they also have a darker side. If
it affects an important gene -- for example, rendering a
tumour-suppressing gene useless -- a mutation can have disastrous
consequences. Nevertheless, protecting all genes from mutation would use
up too many of the cell's resources, just like holding all deposits in
maximum-security safes would be prohibitively expensive. Iñigo
Martincorena, a PhD student in Luscombe's lab, has now found that cells
evolved a 'risk management' strategy to address this issue.
Looking at 120,000 tiny genetic mutations called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 34 strains of the bacterium E. coli,
the scientists were able to quantify how random the mutation rate was
in different areas of the bacterial genomes. Their results showed that
key genes mutate at a much lower rate than the rest of the genetic
material, which decreases the risk of such genes suffering a detrimental
mutation. "We were struck by how variable the mutation rate appears to
be along the genome," says Martincorena. "Our observations suggest these
bacteria have evolved a clever mechanism to control the rate of
evolution in crucial areas of the genome."
Using population genetics techniques, the researchers were able to
disentangle the effects of mutation rate and natural selection on
mutations, settling a long-standing debate in the field. Scientists have
long thought that the chances of a mutation occurring were independent
of its value to an organism. Once the mutation had occurred, it would
undergo natural selection, spreading through the population or being
eliminated depending on how beneficial or detrimental the genetic change
proved to be.
"For many years in evolution there has been an assumption that
mutations occur randomly, and that selection 'cleans them up'," explains
Martincorena. "But what we see here suggests that genomes have
developed mechanisms to avoid mutations in regions that are more
valuable than others."
Observations from studies of cancer genomes suggest that similar
mechanisms may be involved in the development of cancers, so Luscombe
and colleagues would now like to investigate exactly how this
risk-managing gene protection works at a molecular level, and what role
it may play in tumour cells.
Journal Reference:
- Iñigo Martincorena, Aswin S. N. Seshasayee, Nicholas M. Luscombe. Evidence of non-random mutation rates suggests an evolutionary risk management strategy. Nature, 2012; DOI: 10.1038/nature10995
Courtesy: ScienceDaily
No comments:
Post a Comment