A low-sugar diet in utero and in the first
two years of life can meaningfully reduce the risk of chronic diseases
in adulthood, a new study has found, providing compelling new evidence
of the lifelong health effects of early-life sugar consumption.
Published in Science, the
study finds that children who experienced sugar restrictions during
their first 1,000 days after conception had up to 35% lower risk of
developing Type 2 diabetes and as much as 20% less risk of hypertension
as adults. Low sugar intake by the mother prior to birth was enough to
lower risks, but continued sugar restriction after birth increased the
benefits.
Taking advantage of an unintended "natural experiment" from World War
II, researchers at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and
Sciences, McGill University in Montreal, and the University of
California, Berkeley, examined how sugar rationing during the war
influenced long-term health outcomes.
The United Kingdom introduced limits on sugar distribution in 1942 as
part of its wartime food rationing program. Rationing ended in
September 1953.
The researchers used contemporary data from the U.K. Biobank, a
database of medical histories and genetic, lifestyle and other disease
risk factors, to study the effect of those early-life sugar restrictions
on health outcomes of adults conceived in the U.K. just before and
after the end of wartime sugar rationing.
"Studying the long-term effects of added sugar on health is
challenging," says study corresponding author Tadeja Gracner, senior
economist at the USC Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research.
"It is hard to find situations where people are randomly exposed to
different nutritional environments early in life and follow them for 50
to 60 years. The end of rationing provided us with a novel natural
experiment to overcome these problems."
Sugar intake during rationing was about 8 teaspoons (40 grams) per
day on average. When rationing ended, sugar and sweets consumption
skyrocketed to about 16 teaspoons (80 grams) per day.
Notably, rationing did not involve extreme food deprivation overall.
Diets generally appeared to have been, in fact, within today's
guidelines set by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the World
Health Organization, which recommend no added sugars for children under
two and not more than 12 teaspoons (50g) of added sugar daily for
adults.
The immediate and large increase in
sugar consumption but no other foods after rationing ended created an
interesting natural experiment: Individuals were exposed to varying
levels of sugar intake early in life, depending on whether they were
conceived or born before or after September 1953. Those conceived or
born just before the end of rationing experienced sugar-scarce
conditions compared to those born just after who were born into a more
sugar-rich environment.
The researchers then identified those born around this time in the
U.K. Biobank data collected over 50 years later. Using a very tight
birth window around the end of sugar rationing allowed the authors to
compare midlife health outcomes of otherwise similar birth cohorts.
While living through the period of sugar restriction during the first
1,000 days of life substantially lowered the risk of developing
diabetes and hypertension, for those who were later diagnosed with
either of those conditions, onset of disease was delayed by four years
and two years, respectively.
Notably, exposure to sugar restrictions in utero alone was enough to
lower risks, but disease protection increased postnatally once solids
were likely introduced.
The magnitude of this effect is meaningful as it can save costs,
extend life expectancy and, perhaps more importantly, quality of life,
say the researchers.
In the United States, people with diabetes incur annual medical
expenditures of about $12,000 on average. Further, earlier diagnosis of
diabetes means significantly shorter life expectancy, with every decade
earlier that a diagnosis of diabetes is made cutting three to four years
off of life expectancy.
These numbers underscore the value of early interventions that could delay or prevent this disease, the researchers note.
Experts' concerns about children's long-term health as they consume
excessive amounts of added sugars during their early life, a critical
period of development, continue to mount. Adjusting child sugar
consumption, however, is not easy -- added sugar is everywhere, even in
baby and toddler foods, and children are bombarded with TV ads for
sugary snacks, say the researchers.
"Parents need information about
what works, and this study provides some of the first causal evidence
that reducing added sugar early in life is a powerful step towards
improving children's health over their lifetimes," says study co-author
Claire Boone of McGill University and the University of Chicago.
Co-author Paul Gertler of UC Berkeley and the National Bureau of
Economics Research adds: "Sugar early in life is the new tobacco, and we
should treat it as such by holding food companies accountable to
reformulate baby foods with healthier options and regulate the marketing
and tax sugary foods targeted at kids."
This study is the first of a larger research effort exploring how
early-life sugar restrictions affected a broader set of economic and
health outcomes in later adulthood, including education, wealth, and
chronic inflammation, cognitive function and dementia.
Journal Reference:
- Tadeja Gracner, Claire Boone, Paul J. Gertler. Exposure to sugar rationing in the first 1000 days of life protected against chronic disease. Science, 2024; DOI: 10.1126/science.adn5421
Courtesy:
University of Southern California. "Restricting sugar consumption in
utero and in early childhood significantly reduces risk of midlife
chronic disease, study finds." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 31 October
2024. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/10/241031185320.htm>.